IVS Analysis Report for VO4129 (20240508-vo4129) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by Sergei Bolotin, NVI, Inc. / NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: nuSolve solutions.) Session scheduled at NASA, correlated at HAYS and analyzed at NASA Problems: HOBART12(Hb) Only 18 scans and weak fringes, just 32 observations in the solution. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session statistics Observations: 4416 scheduled 4410 correlated (in database) 4407 recoverable (usable) 4124 used Session fit: 31.273 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12 54 53 32 59.3% KOKEE12M 1545 1541 1414 91.5% MACGO12M 2631 2627 2476 94.1% RAEGSMAR 2143 2138 2027 94.6% WESTFORD 2459 2455 2299 93.5% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 4416 4407 4124 93.4% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0059+581 156 156 151 96.8% 0104-408 6 6 2 33.3% 0119+115 75 75 72 96.0% 0133+476 126 126 120 95.2% 0434-188 21 21 13 61.9% 0458-020 87 87 83 95.4% 0552+398 123 123 123 100.0% 0602+673 180 180 180 100.0% 0656+082 3 3 3 100.0% 0718+793 24 24 24 100.0% 0727-115 57 57 40 70.2% 0805+410 63 63 60 95.2% OJ287 93 93 87 93.5% 0955+476 81 81 78 96.3% 1124-186 45 45 37 82.2% 1144-379 6 6 1 16.7% 1156+295 60 60 57 95.0% 3C274 24 24 24 100.0% 1255-316 18 18 11 61.1% 1334-127 51 51 49 96.1% 1519-273 24 24 16 66.7% NRAO512 54 54 54 100.0% 1741-038 66 66 66 100.0% 1749+096 60 60 56 93.3% 1803+784 240 240 238 99.2% 1908-201 30 30 30 100.0% 1921-293 9 9 9 100.0% 1923+210 6 6 6 100.0% 3C418 156 156 107 68.6% 2113+293 69 69 68 98.6% 2149+056 30 30 28 93.3% 2255-282 21 21 21 100.0% 2318+049 81 81 81 100.0% 0345+460 57 57 57 100.0% 0346-279 33 33 23 69.7% 0613+570 144 144 142 98.6% 0648-165 48 48 36 75.0% 1149-084 33 33 29 87.9% 1639-062 48 48 45 93.8% 1846+322 69 63 63 91.3% 2227-088 75 75 72 96.0% 2229+695 213 213 201 94.4% 0420+022 51 51 49 96.1% 0446+112 48 48 45 93.8% 0748+126 39 39 35 89.7% 1144+402 90 90 85 94.4% 1705+018 60 60 60 100.0% 1732+389 90 90 90 100.0% 0537-286 24 24 18 75.0% 0606-223 21 21 17 81.0% 0646-306 18 18 7 38.9% 2008-159 66 66 60 90.9% 0016+731 243 243 241 99.2% 0109+224 84 84 82 97.6% 0332-403 3 3 1 33.3% 0847-120 9 9 3 33.3% 1308+328 33 33 31 93.9% 1502+036 18 18 18 100.0% 1555+001 42 42 42 100.0% 1657-261 45 45 37 82.2% 0017+200 33 33 33 100.0% 0202+319 66 66 64 97.0% 0642+449 117 117 116 99.1% 1213-172 48 48 37 77.1% 1243-072 6 6 5 83.3% 1406-076 33 33 33 100.0% 1504+377 102 102 100 98.0% 1538+149 81 81 81 100.0% 1751+288 81 81 71 87.7% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 4416 4410 4124 93.4% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12-KOKEE12M 18 18 10 55.6% HOBART12-MACGO12M 18 18 13 72.2% HOBART12-RAEGSMAR 0 NO DATA NO DATA 0.0% HOBART12-WESTFORD 18 17 9 50.0% KOKEE12M-MACGO12M 616 615 574 93.2% KOKEE12M-RAEGSMAR 381 379 346 90.8% KOKEE12M-WESTFORD 530 529 484 91.3% MACGO12M-RAEGSMAR 924 922 882 95.5% MACGO12M-WESTFORD 1073 1072 1007 93.8% RAEGSMAR-WESTFORD 838 837 799 95.3% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 4416 4407 4124 93.4% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.