IVS Analysis Report for RD2101 ($21JAN13XA) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by Sergei Bolotin, NVI, Inc. / NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: - KUNMING did not observed ~10hrs of the session due to "other commitment". Parameterization comments: a clock break was added to KUNMING. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 2225 scheduled 1811 correlated (in database) 1451 recoverable (usable) 1401 used Session fit: 38.060 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HARTRAO 622 461 451 72.5% HOBART26 487 246 242 49.7% KOKEE 545 351 339 62.2% KUNMING 980 392 381 38.9% ONSALA60 897 719 690 76.9% WETTZELL 919 733 699 76.1% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 2225 1451 1401 63.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0014+813 42 36 23 54.8% 0106+013 44 30 30 68.2% 0116-219 31 28 21 67.7% 0138-097 38 35 34 89.5% 0202-172 22 20 18 81.8% 0234+285 48 33 32 66.7% 0237+040 45 42 31 68.9% 0300+470 49 31 29 59.2% 0507+179 43 43 43 100.0% 0636+680 48 36 31 64.6% 0722+145 44 44 37 84.1% 0743-006 21 21 7 33.3% 0814+425 54 54 48 88.9% 0823-223 22 22 1 4.5% 0834+250 27 27 16 59.3% 4C39.25 46 46 30 65.2% 0954+658 48 39 39 81.2% 1012+232 24 24 21 87.5% 1039+811 48 42 36 75.0% 1055+018 33 33 32 97.0% 1101+384 35 32 26 74.3% 1145+268 33 30 26 78.8% 1147+245 33 30 28 84.8% 1441+252 23 13 8 34.8% 1502+106 41 38 34 82.9% 1510-089 36 26 20 55.6% 1511-100 35 25 22 62.9% 1633+38 39 27 25 64.1% 1637+574 33 28 26 78.8% 1739+522 30 27 21 70.0% 1823+568 33 27 24 72.7% 1933-400 31 15 7 22.6% 2022-077 47 29 25 53.2% 2145+067 47 28 25 53.2% 2201+315 11 9 8 72.7% 2232-488 20 8 4 20.0% 2329-384 31 13 9 29.0% 0055-059 45 38 33 73.3% 0149+218 48 36 32 66.7% 0406-127 33 29 13 39.4% NRAO190 30 28 6 20.0% 0607-157 16 16 15 93.8% 0707+476 45 42 41 91.1% 0919-260 49 49 22 44.9% 1022+194 27 27 22 81.5% 1034-374 28 28 21 75.0% 1038+52B 47 45 1 2.1% 1459+480 37 37 33 89.2% 2127-096 44 22 18 40.9% 2131-021 36 19 17 47.2% 2234+282 44 27 26 59.1% 0010+405 45 34 31 68.9% 0013-005 45 25 9 20.0% 0227-369 31 23 10 32.3% 0346-279 17 12 12 70.6% 0436-129 21 19 11 52.4% 0444+634 48 30 25 52.1% 1045-188 29 29 22 75.9% 1133-032 35 35 34 97.1% 1443-162 18 15 12 66.7% 1738+476 30 30 24 80.0% 1743+173 42 25 14 33.3% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 2225 1811 1401 63.0% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HARTRAO-HOBART26 90 62 60 66.7% HARTRAO-KOKEE 0 NOT CORR NOT CORR 0.0% HARTRAO-KUNMING 178 84 80 44.9% HARTRAO-ONSALA60 171 155 151 88.3% HARTRAO-WETTZELL 183 160 160 87.4% HOBART26-KOKEE 95 56 56 58.9% HOBART26-KUNMING 196 59 59 30.1% HOBART26-ONSALA60 47 32 32 68.1% HOBART26-WETTZELL 59 37 35 59.3% KOKEE-KUNMING 167 43 42 25.1% KOKEE-ONSALA60 146 127 123 84.2% KOKEE-WETTZELL 137 125 118 86.1% KUNMING-ONSALA60 216 100 99 45.8% KUNMING-WETTZELL 223 106 101 45.3% ONSALA60-WETTZELL 317 305 285 89.9% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 2225 1451 1401 63.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.