IVS Analysis Report for AOV065 ($21NOV16XA) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by Sergei Bolotin, NVI, Inc. / NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: KATH12M Dbbc failure during the first ~9 hrs of the session. KUNMING Has a gap of ~7 hrs in observations. YARRA12M Mk5 creashed (17:30-17:46). Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session statistics Observations: 2883 scheduled 2222 correlated (in database) 1507 recoverable (usable) 1356 used Session fit: 30.574 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used ISHIOKA 838 563 522 62.3% KATH12M 872 241 180 20.6% KUNMING 845 425 403 47.7% SESHAN25 899 618 564 62.7% URUMQI 602 472 459 76.2% WARK12M 844 317 294 34.8% YARRA12M 866 378 290 33.5% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 2883 1507 1356 47.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0035-534 24 18 3 12.5% 0100-760 27 20 12 44.4% 0112-017 111 108 70 63.1% 0150-144 97 91 74 76.3% 0241-564 18 14 0 0.0% 0454-316 91 70 48 52.7% 0622-645 24 14 8 33.3% 0843-547 27 11 0 0.0% 0844-652 12 6 3 25.0% 0917-354 51 37 16 31.4% 0950-271 45 34 22 48.9% 0959-443 30 20 3 10.0% 1036-431 27 17 2 7.4% 1040-414 27 19 11 40.7% 1058-425 36 19 2 5.6% 1215-457 28 17 0 0.0% 1249-673 12 8 7 58.3% 1253-590 12 6 0 0.0% 1307-556 27 12 2 7.4% 1318-434 41 20 3 7.3% 1442-160 82 46 16 19.5% 1510-323 51 31 22 43.1% 1710-323 61 42 8 13.1% 1711-251 76 50 0 0.0% 1941-554 36 32 1 2.8% 2101-490 58 52 33 56.9% 2221-116 76 76 41 53.9% 2251-419 65 65 22 33.8% 2254-130 85 70 22 25.9% 2325-408 73 58 40 54.8% 2332-531 35 35 17 48.6% 0804-267 55 38 14 25.5% 1116-462 30 17 15 50.0% 1143-332 34 22 11 32.4% 1306-395 43 23 16 37.2% 1412-368 48 26 10 20.8% 1600-445 39 23 14 35.9% 1647-296 82 57 52 63.4% 1929-457 41 39 23 56.1% 2331-240 76 76 60 78.9% 0003-066 54 54 52 96.3% 0048-097 82 54 48 58.5% 0059+581 60 60 53 88.3% OJ287 51 43 43 84.3% 1128+385 84 54 51 60.7% 1726+455 51 36 35 68.6% 1749+096 54 48 43 79.6% 2113+293 42 36 31 73.8% 0524+034 84 67 30 35.7% 0641+392 120 104 80 66.7% 0322+222 126 105 76 60.3% 1039+811 84 70 68 81.0% 1514+197 78 52 23 29.5% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 2883 2222 1356 47.0% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used ISHIOKA-KATH12M 124 49 12 9.7% ISHIOKA-KUNMING 154 90 90 58.4% ISHIOKA-SESHAN25 193 182 180 93.3% ISHIOKA-URUMQI 131 127 126 96.2% ISHIOKA-WARK12M 118 55 55 46.6% ISHIOKA-YARRA12M 118 60 59 50.0% KATH12M-KUNMING 118 31 31 26.3% KATH12M-SESHAN25 119 38 36 30.3% KATH12M-URUMQI 56 25 25 44.6% KATH12M-WARK12M 227 32 31 13.7% KATH12M-YARRA12M 228 66 45 19.7% KUNMING-SESHAN25 195 110 103 52.8% KUNMING-URUMQI 143 90 87 60.8% KUNMING-WARK12M 114 50 48 42.1% KUNMING-YARRA12M 121 54 44 36.4% SESHAN25-URUMQI 161 156 154 95.7% SESHAN25-WARK12M 112 61 57 50.9% SESHAN25-YARRA12M 119 71 34 28.6% URUMQI-WARK12M 52 33 31 59.6% URUMQI-YARRA12M 59 41 36 61.0% WARK12M-YARRA12M 221 86 72 32.6% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 2883 1507 1356 47.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.