IVS Analysis Report for RD1704 ($17MAR29XA) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by David Gordon, Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: NYALES20 did not observe due to receiver maintenance. HOBART26-TIANMA65 baseline very noisy in S-band; has only channels S1-S3. The TIANMA65 log has no Field System version number and the wrong station name. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: Observed Gaia transfer sources. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 1082 scheduled 678 correlated (in database) 525 recoverable (usable) 506 used Session fit: 23.731 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HARTRAO 286 185 178 62.2% HOBART26 243 114 108 44.4% MEDICINA 434 273 266 61.3% NYALES20 389 MISSED MISSED 0.0% TIANMA65 412 226 213 51.7% WETTZELL 400 252 247 61.8% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 1082 525 506 46.8% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0137+012 30 17 16 53.3% 0211+171 36 18 7 19.4% 0241+622 75 37 24 32.0% 0312+100 26 17 14 53.8% 0316-444 8 8 0 0.0% 0410+110 47 28 14 29.8% 0522-611 9 8 2 22.2% 0823-223 30 30 3 10.0% 0912+297 15 9 7 46.7% 1046-409 3 3 0 0.0% 1125+366 36 18 16 44.4% 1143-332 12 10 9 75.0% 1251-197 9 9 8 88.9% 1333-152 6 6 5 83.3% 1333-337 8 8 3 37.5% 1908+484 41 20 10 24.4% 2135-184 13 13 0 0.0% 2145+082 41 29 23 56.1% 2254+024 20 14 7 35.0% 2314-409 9 7 4 44.4% 2329-415 8 8 3 37.5% 1104+728 52 26 23 44.2% 1215+303 56 27 27 48.2% 1348+308 46 21 21 45.7% IIIZW2 29 17 3 10.3% 0528-250 26 26 24 92.3% 1330+476 55 26 25 45.5% 1349-439 5 3 2 40.0% 2029+024 19 15 15 78.9% 2155-304 20 20 19 95.0% 0119+115 12 5 3 25.0% 0552+398 15 6 6 40.0% 0718+793 10 6 6 60.0% 0955+476 6 2 2 33.3% 1057-797 5 5 5 100.0% 1124-186 17 16 16 94.1% 1156+295 19 10 10 52.6% 1255-316 19 19 19 100.0% 1351-018 5 3 3 60.0% 1418+546 3 1 1 33.3% 1519-273 13 13 12 92.3% 1741-038 9 9 9 100.0% 1923+210 3 1 1 33.3% 2113+293 6 3 2 33.3% 2318+049 12 5 5 41.7% 0237-027 17 11 11 64.7% 0648-165 4 4 4 100.0% 1732+389 6 3 2 33.3% 2059+034 6 3 3 50.0% 2309+454 9 4 4 44.4% 0322+222 9 6 6 66.7% 0920-397 2 2 1 50.0% 1759-396 1 1 1 100.0% 1920-211 1 1 1 100.0% 0131-522 1 1 1 100.0% 0827+243 37 19 19 51.4% 1219+044 18 7 7 38.9% 1538+149 21 12 10 47.6% 1849+670 6 2 2 33.3% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 1082 678 506 46.8% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HARTRAO-HOBART26 56 29 29 51.8% HARTRAO-MEDICINA 75 64 61 81.3% HARTRAO-NYALES20 44 MISSED MISSED 0.0% HARTRAO-TIANMA65 57 44 40 70.2% HARTRAO-WETTZELL 54 48 48 88.9% HOBART26-MEDICINA 10 4 4 40.0% HOBART26-NYALES20 22 MISSED MISSED 0.0% HOBART26-TIANMA65 138 73 67 48.6% HOBART26-WETTZELL 17 8 8 47.1% MEDICINA-NYALES20 127 MISSED MISSED 0.0% MEDICINA-TIANMA65 75 59 58 77.3% MEDICINA-WETTZELL 147 146 143 97.3% NYALES20-TIANMA65 78 MISSED MISSED 0.0% NYALES20-WETTZELL 118 MISSED MISSED 0.0% TIANMA65-WETTZELL 64 50 48 75.0% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 1082 525 506 46.8% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.