IVS Analysis Report for R4741 ($16MAY26XE) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by Alan L. Fey, United States Naval Observatory. Spoolfile source: opa solution.) Problems: None. Parameterization comments: HOBART12-MATERA Baseline Clock offset HOBART12-NYALES20 Baseline Clock offset HOBART12-WARK12M Baseline Clock offset Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 1468 scheduled 1346 correlated (in database) 1253 recoverable (usable) 1251 used Session fit: 25.666 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12 479 417 417 87.1% MATERA 674 518 516 76.6% NYALES20 729 598 596 81.8% WARK12M 352 336 336 95.5% WETTZELL 702 637 637 90.7% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 1468 1253 1251 85.2% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 2243-123 6 6 6 100.0% 0636+680 10 9 9 90.0% OK290 9 8 8 88.9% 3C309.1 19 17 16 84.2% OQ208 20 20 15 75.0% 0048-097 2 2 2 100.0% 0059+581 46 40 40 87.0% 0104-408 7 7 7 100.0% 0119+041 15 11 11 73.3% 0229+131 61 48 48 78.7% 0454-234 27 27 27 100.0% 0458-020 33 29 27 81.8% 0530-727 7 7 7 100.0% 0556+238 11 8 7 63.6% 0656+082 6 4 4 66.7% 0727-115 19 19 19 100.0% 0749+540 43 40 36 83.7% OJ287 67 63 63 94.0% 0955+476 31 29 29 93.5% 1057-797 18 18 18 100.0% 1124-186 8 8 8 100.0% 1144-379 10 10 10 100.0% 1255-316 15 13 13 86.7% 1351-018 19 19 17 89.5% 1424-418 16 15 15 93.8% 1519-273 13 13 13 100.0% NRAO512 37 35 35 94.6% 1741-038 20 18 18 90.0% 1921-293 13 13 13 100.0% 1923+210 22 20 20 90.9% 1958-179 19 17 15 78.9% 3C418 35 31 29 82.9% 2052-474 19 19 19 100.0% 2255-282 6 5 5 83.3% 0237-027 5 3 3 60.0% 0912+029 6 5 5 83.3% 1111+149 32 31 14 43.8% 1639+230 28 26 26 92.9% 1800+440 21 20 20 95.2% 1846+322 18 15 13 72.2% 2155+312 18 17 17 94.4% 0054+161 6 6 6 100.0% 0134+311 19 14 14 73.7% 0415+398 23 22 22 95.7% 0446+112 4 3 3 75.0% 0529+483 3 3 3 100.0% 0641+392 16 12 12 75.0% 0748+126 47 41 38 80.9% 1144+402 52 50 38 73.1% 1623+578 6 6 6 100.0% 2059+034 12 11 10 83.3% 2141+175 52 51 50 96.2% 2309+454 4 4 4 100.0% 2319+317 4 4 4 100.0% 0322+222 60 56 52 86.7% 0400-319 3 2 1 33.3% 0534-340 1 0 0 0.0% 0920-397 10 10 9 90.0% 1406-267 1 0 0 0.0% 1759-396 6 5 5 83.3% 0016+731 34 30 30 88.2% 0743+277 9 8 7 77.8% 1243-160 5 5 4 80.0% 1657-261 9 5 1 11.1% 2013+163 27 25 21 77.8% 2335-027 15 14 7 46.7% 2357-318 5 5 3 60.0% 0403-132 9 8 4 44.4% 0834-201 7 7 2 28.6% 1039+811 22 22 22 100.0% 1514+197 39 38 34 87.2% 1751+288 62 60 60 96.8% 1849+670 50 48 48 96.0% 2126-158 9 6 4 44.4% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 1468 1346 1251 85.2% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12-MATERA 45 25 25 55.6% HOBART12-NYALES20 89 68 68 76.4% HOBART12-WARK12M 286 282 282 98.6% HOBART12-WETTZELL 59 42 42 71.2% MATERA-NYALES20 287 192 190 66.2% MATERA-WARK12M 4 0 DESELECTED 0.0% MATERA-WETTZELL 338 301 301 89.1% NYALES20-WARK12M 55 49 49 89.1% NYALES20-WETTZELL 298 289 289 97.0% WARK12M-WETTZELL 7 5 5 71.4% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 1468 1253 1251 85.2% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.