IVS Analysis Report for AUA009 ($16FEB23XA) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by David Gordon, Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: Three smalll clock breaks at KATH12M. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: No log file for KATH12M. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 5827 scheduled 4997 correlated (in database) 4686 recoverable (usable) 4534 used Session fit: 43.389 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12 2684 2209 2107 78.5% HOBART26 1074 826 757 70.5% KATH12M 2629 2024 1962 74.6% WARK12M 2618 2152 2121 81.0% YARRA12M 2649 2161 2121 80.1% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 5827 4686 4534 77.8% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 3C279 160 122 118 73.8% 1424-418 233 187 181 77.7% 1057-797 325 277 251 77.2% 1156+295 31 15 12 38.7% 0919-260 21 12 9 42.9% 1055+018 28 14 14 50.0% 1510-089 69 48 48 69.6% 1749+096 124 103 100 80.6% 1611+343 24 20 17 70.8% 0637-752 159 121 105 66.0% 1622-253 31 17 17 54.8% 0834-201 60 42 37 61.7% 1334-127 161 123 117 72.7% 0212-620 87 69 38 43.7% 1144-379 111 88 87 78.4% 1124-186 42 32 30 71.4% 1741-038 133 119 114 85.7% 1908-201 90 89 88 97.8% 1941-554 69 53 15 21.7% 1519-273 40 24 23 57.5% 1255-316 46 29 29 63.0% 1334-649 94 68 1 1.1% 1921-293 192 180 180 93.8% 1954-388 206 186 178 86.4% 1145-071 22 22 21 95.5% 0918-534 66 51 35 53.0% 3C274 6 6 2 33.3% 2052-474 246 222 207 84.1% 0758-737 88 74 24 27.3% 1633+38 12 12 11 91.7% 1751+288 34 27 27 79.4% 2333-528 66 52 41 62.1% 2128-123 15 12 9 60.0% 2149-306 52 43 40 76.9% 2232-488 61 57 43 70.5% 2145+067 115 106 102 88.7% 2255-282 24 18 15 62.5% 3C446 95 76 74 77.9% 2005+403 12 9 0 0.0% CTA102 125 117 116 92.8% 0308-611 113 105 100 88.5% 2243-123 6 6 4 66.7% 0003-066 9 9 7 77.8% 0208-512 92 91 87 94.6% VR422201 3 3 2 66.7% 0106+013 141 130 128 90.8% 0244-470 63 57 39 61.9% 0332-403 72 71 69 95.8% 0229+131 19 17 16 84.2% 0202+319 25 22 21 84.0% CTA26 129 115 111 86.0% 0537-441 242 215 211 87.2% 0454-234 198 183 179 90.4% 0521-365 61 52 52 85.2% 0420-014 112 99 97 86.6% 0537-286 62 56 56 90.3% NRAO190 53 49 46 86.8% 0119+115 60 50 38 63.3% 0234+285 40 35 33 82.5% 0607-157 188 187 182 96.8% 0528+134 15 15 15 100.0% 0723-008 172 157 151 87.8% 0727-115 158 143 137 86.7% 0552+398 12 12 11 91.7% OJ287 113 99 93 82.3% 0235+164 6 6 6 100.0% 0738+313 27 27 27 100.0% 1104-445 6 6 3 50.0% 4C39.25 18 16 16 88.9% 0823+033 22 14 14 63.6% 1128+385 15 8 7 46.7% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 5827 4997 4534 77.8% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12-HOBART26 278 171 108 38.8% HOBART12-KATH12M 803 643 620 77.2% HOBART12-WARK12M 794 702 697 87.8% HOBART12-YARRA12M 809 693 682 84.3% HOBART26-KATH12M 256 195 192 75.0% HOBART26-WARK12M 269 233 231 85.9% HOBART26-YARRA12M 271 227 226 83.4% KATH12M-WARK12M 778 581 565 72.6% KATH12M-YARRA12M 792 605 585 73.9% WARK12M-YARRA12M 777 636 628 80.8% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 5827 4686 4534 77.8% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.