IVS Analysis Report for RD1502 ($15APR08XA) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by David Gordon, Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: None. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: 20 Gaia transfer sources observed. Low yields on some of these. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 1813 scheduled 1756 correlated (in database) 1370 recoverable (usable) 1359 used Session fit: 24.565 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HARTRAO 419 300 294 70.2% HOBART26 401 272 270 67.3% KOKEE 336 272 271 80.7% MATERA 534 415 411 77.0% NYALES20 458 330 328 71.6% ONSALA60 447 393 390 87.2% SESHAN25 518 348 347 67.0% WETTZELL 513 410 407 79.3% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 1813 1370 1359 75.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0241+622 79 79 14 17.7% 0325+395 15 14 14 93.3% 0410+110 77 77 44 57.1% 0454-463 23 19 17 73.9% 0812+020 75 74 70 93.3% 0823-223 63 63 9 14.3% 0912+297 66 63 12 18.2% 1104+728 41 39 28 68.3% 1143-332 30 28 9 30.0% 2145+082 21 21 12 57.1% 2239+096 81 80 77 95.1% 2314-409 21 20 16 76.2% 2329-415 20 20 13 65.0% 2353+816 71 68 68 95.8% 0528-250 68 61 52 76.5% 1330+022 63 62 56 88.9% 1424+240 84 83 83 98.8% 2029+024 3 3 3 100.0% 1348+308 116 114 91 78.4% 1022+194 72 69 67 93.1% 1125+366 86 86 17 19.8% 1215+303 65 64 62 95.4% 1736+324 17 16 13 76.5% 0059+581 33 33 33 100.0% 0530-727 3 3 3 100.0% 1034-293 4 4 1 25.0% 1128+385 21 21 17 81.0% 1418+546 49 46 46 93.9% 1424-418 9 8 8 88.9% 1749+096 58 57 57 98.3% 1803+784 54 53 53 98.1% 3C418 33 33 33 100.0% 3C446 55 51 48 87.3% 2255-282 6 5 5 83.3% 0237-027 25 25 25 100.0% 1244-255 5 3 2 40.0% 1324+224 21 15 15 71.4% 0748+126 11 11 11 100.0% 1520+319 3 3 3 100.0% 2214+350 36 36 33 91.7% 0414-189 11 11 11 100.0% 0646-306 2 2 2 100.0% 1759-396 1 1 0 0.0% 2008-159 37 35 32 86.5% 2300-683 4 4 3 75.0% 1555+001 15 15 15 100.0% 2013+163 1 1 1 100.0% 0131-522 5 5 3 60.0% 0202+319 23 23 23 100.0% 0437-454 2 2 2 100.0% 1406-076 19 17 17 89.5% 1706-174 4 4 4 100.0% 1758-651 6 6 6 100.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 1813 1756 1359 75.0% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HARTRAO-HOBART26 64 48 48 75.0% HARTRAO-KOKEE 0 NOT CORR NOT CORR 0.0% HARTRAO-MATERA 108 76 72 66.7% HARTRAO-NYALES20 43 25 25 58.1% HARTRAO-ONSALA60 71 65 64 90.1% HARTRAO-SESHAN25 49 30 30 61.2% HARTRAO-WETTZELL 84 56 55 65.5% HOBART26-KOKEE 101 77 76 75.2% HOBART26-MATERA 30 15 15 50.0% HOBART26-NYALES20 31 20 20 64.5% HOBART26-ONSALA60 13 9 9 69.2% HOBART26-SESHAN25 138 92 91 65.9% HOBART26-WETTZELL 24 11 11 45.8% KOKEE-MATERA 19 16 16 84.2% KOKEE-NYALES20 71 57 57 80.3% KOKEE-ONSALA60 29 26 26 89.7% KOKEE-SESHAN25 82 68 68 82.9% KOKEE-WETTZELL 34 28 28 82.4% MATERA-NYALES20 76 54 54 71.1% MATERA-ONSALA60 132 116 116 87.9% MATERA-SESHAN25 54 34 34 63.0% MATERA-WETTZELL 115 104 104 90.4% NYALES20-ONSALA60 65 56 55 84.6% NYALES20-SESHAN25 73 41 41 56.2% NYALES20-WETTZELL 99 77 76 76.8% ONSALA60-SESHAN25 51 35 35 68.6% ONSALA60-WETTZELL 86 86 85 98.8% SESHAN25-WETTZELL 71 48 48 67.6% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 1813 1370 1359 75.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.