IVS Analysis Report for A1529 ($15JUN24XA) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by Sergei Bolotin, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: no data from WARK12M for the first ~4hrs of obsevrations. Parameterization comments: even clock breaks were added to KATH12M, three -- to HOBART12 and one to HART15M. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 5954 scheduled 5279 correlated (in database) 5089 recoverable (usable) 4922 used Session fit: 37.268 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M 1437 1077 1027 71.5% HOBART12 2712 2358 2297 84.7% KATH12M 2754 2478 2401 87.2% WARK12M 2367 1896 1847 78.0% YARRA12M 2638 2369 2272 86.1% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 5954 5089 4922 82.7% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used NRAO530 179 156 152 84.9% 1657-261 143 111 72 50.3% 1741-038 157 146 145 92.4% 0003-066 5 4 4 80.0% 1510-089 161 132 130 80.7% 0208-512 30 19 18 60.0% 1611+343 47 41 34 72.3% 1334-127 179 144 144 80.4% 2255-282 26 20 19 73.1% 1424-418 240 202 197 82.1% VR422201 17 14 14 82.4% 0521-365 209 202 192 91.9% 1633+38 40 36 35 87.5% CTA102 130 104 101 77.7% 0106+013 97 70 67 69.1% 1519-273 67 66 61 91.0% 1057-797 57 47 46 80.7% 1751+288 35 35 35 100.0% 0308-611 318 294 272 85.5% 1749+096 146 142 139 95.2% 1255-316 25 24 22 88.0% 2145+067 76 53 52 68.4% 2232-488 232 205 182 78.4% 0537-441 163 143 143 87.7% 0229+131 76 58 54 71.1% 0332-403 244 213 210 86.1% 0119+115 57 49 45 78.9% 0637-752 71 59 51 71.8% CTA26 56 42 35 62.5% 2131-021 125 101 84 67.2% 3C446 45 30 28 62.2% NRAO512 15 15 15 100.0% 2149-306 202 177 160 79.2% 0454-234 207 197 193 93.2% NRAO190 104 92 73 70.2% 0420-014 131 115 112 85.5% 2243-123 15 12 11 73.3% 0234+285 67 58 57 85.1% 0607-157 118 108 107 90.7% 2136+141 14 8 8 57.1% 1958-179 106 106 100 94.3% 1921-293 119 113 113 95.0% 0727-115 177 170 168 94.9% 0834-201 163 153 106 65.0% 1104-445 37 34 33 89.2% 0723-008 146 132 102 69.9% 0552+398 29 28 26 89.7% 0528+134 12 12 12 100.0% 1954-388 86 86 85 98.8% 0748+126 21 21 13 61.9% 0919-260 10 8 8 80.0% 0743-006 101 101 89 88.1% 1045-188 124 114 112 90.3% 1144-379 14 14 14 100.0% 0738+313 53 52 45 84.9% OJ287 95 92 92 96.8% 2128-123 20 20 20 100.0% 4C39.25 36 33 33 91.7% 3C279 164 132 132 80.5% 1128+385 33 33 24 72.7% 0642+449 6 6 4 66.7% 1144+402 21 21 19 90.5% 2052-474 32 32 32 100.0% 1908-201 10 10 9 90.0% 3C274 10 9 9 90.0% 1920-211 3 3 3 100.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 5954 5279 4922 82.7% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M-HOBART12 328 249 243 74.1% HART15M-KATH12M 365 268 262 71.8% HART15M-WARK12M 194 128 124 63.9% HART15M-YARRA12M 550 432 398 72.4% HOBART12-KATH12M 844 792 770 91.2% HOBART12-WARK12M 827 646 635 76.8% HOBART12-YARRA12M 713 671 649 91.0% KATH12M-WARK12M 758 637 616 81.3% KATH12M-YARRA12M 787 781 753 95.7% WARK12M-YARRA12M 588 485 472 80.3% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 5954 5089 4922 82.7% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.