IVS Analysis Report for A1510 ($15FEB21XA) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by Sergei Bolotin, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: due to DBBC errors there are no valid data on WARK12M between ~9:00 and 14:00UTC. Also, abnormal clock drift on WARK12M from ~5:00 to 9:00, data were deselected. Parameterization comments: clock breaks were added to KATH12M and WARK12M. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 5105 scheduled 4462 correlated (in database) 4252 recoverable (usable) 3721 used Session fit: 42.515 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M 1089 848 802 73.6% HOBART12 2355 1968 1798 76.3% KATH12M 2338 2090 1866 79.8% WARK12M 2093 1501 1085 51.8% YARRA12M 2335 2097 1891 81.0% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 5105 4252 3721 72.9% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0834-201 144 119 71 49.3% 0537-441 112 97 73 65.2% 0738+313 15 15 11 73.3% 1741-038 124 120 116 93.5% OJ287 76 49 48 63.2% 0826-373 164 139 111 67.7% 0332-403 76 76 53 69.7% 3C279 116 97 96 82.8% 0426-380 174 139 109 62.6% 1510-089 140 136 125 89.3% 0308-611 217 168 114 52.5% 1128+385 8 8 7 87.5% 0454-463 181 129 89 49.2% 1308+326 20 20 18 90.0% 0727-115 135 97 88 65.2% 1921-293 83 78 78 94.0% 1424-418 189 172 170 89.9% 4C39.25 38 19 16 42.1% 2232-488 194 194 135 69.6% 0521-365 170 136 108 63.5% 1334-127 136 128 128 94.1% 1144-379 76 57 54 71.1% 0454-810 315 286 230 73.0% 0607-157 95 67 56 58.9% 1908-201 10 5 5 50.0% 1255-316 33 28 28 84.8% 0454-234 109 100 75 68.8% NRAO530 130 121 118 90.8% 2052-474 77 77 75 97.4% 1633+38 39 39 35 89.7% 1144+402 22 20 18 81.8% 1954-388 76 68 65 85.5% 1749+096 103 103 99 96.1% 1958-179 115 113 108 93.9% 1611+343 20 20 20 100.0% 0637-752 154 127 91 59.1% 2149-306 162 161 128 79.0% 1751+288 12 12 12 100.0% 2131-021 111 110 93 83.8% 2255-282 27 27 26 96.3% 0208-512 35 35 32 91.4% 2145+067 68 64 63 92.6% 2136+141 16 16 15 93.8% 0003-066 4 4 4 100.0% VR422201 15 15 9 60.0% 3C446 84 83 76 90.5% 2243-123 12 12 12 100.0% 2201+315 5 5 4 80.0% CTA102 85 79 75 88.2% 0106+013 83 77 62 74.7% 0119+115 80 70 50 62.5% 3C418 3 3 3 100.0% 0229+131 29 24 15 51.7% CTA26 64 57 36 56.2% 0234+285 52 47 26 50.0% NRAO190 14 11 8 57.1% 0420-014 108 83 62 57.4% 0133+476 6 6 5 83.3% 0528+134 37 28 17 45.9% 0723-008 21 17 11 52.4% 1104-445 11 6 4 36.4% 0552+398 29 21 16 55.2% 0642+449 9 8 4 44.4% 1124-186 29 12 10 34.5% 0823+033 8 2 2 25.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 5105 4462 3721 72.9% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M-HOBART12 267 195 185 69.3% HART15M-KATH12M 263 215 208 79.1% HART15M-WARK12M 172 93 73 42.4% HART15M-YARRA12M 387 345 336 86.8% HOBART12-KATH12M 703 667 646 91.9% HOBART12-WARK12M 723 501 380 52.6% HOBART12-YARRA12M 662 605 587 88.7% KATH12M-WARK12M 642 484 338 52.6% KATH12M-YARRA12M 730 724 674 92.3% WARK12M-YARRA12M 556 423 294 52.9% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 5105 4252 3721 72.9% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.