Analysis Report for R1668 ($14DEC29XA) (Analyzed by David Gordon, Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) The database contains both YEBES40M (analog version) and YEBEDBBC digital version for testing). YEBEDBBC is deselected. Problems: The S-band is noisy at Fortleza; many outliers deselected. NyAlesund's cable cal has a few bad points (jumps). About a dozen points were edited out. The edited cable cal was applied and improves the solution. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 2955 scheduled 4023 correlated (in database) 3239 recoverable (usable) 2493 used Session fit: 26.228 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used FORTLEZA 736 751 423 57.5% MATERA 851 955 726 85.3% NYALES20 914 1005 789 86.3% SEJONG 650 618 586 90.2% TSUKUB32 921 952 857 93.1% WETTZELL 930 1072 832 89.5% YEBES40M 908 1125 773 85.1% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 2955 3239 2493 84.4% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 3C84 1 1 1 100.0% 1432+200 2 1 1 50.0% 0834+250 14 14 14 100.0% 1147+245 28 36 26 92.9% 0422-380 10 10 10 100.0% 1637+574 45 54 42 93.3% 0954+658 47 63 47 100.0% 1042+071 5 5 4 80.0% 1459+480 21 25 21 100.0% 2155+312 14 14 12 85.7% 0059+581 441 540 371 84.1% 0119+115 64 73 55 85.9% 0229+131 172 228 135 78.5% 0434-188 3 5 3 100.0% 0556+238 3 3 3 100.0% 0602+673 70 103 67 95.7% 1124-186 79 128 66 83.5% 1144-379 32 59 15 46.9% 1424-418 16 29 10 62.5% 1622-253 11 18 10 90.9% NGC6251 10 10 9 90.0% 1741-038 95 143 81 85.3% 1923+210 93 102 81 87.1% 1954-388 26 44 20 76.9% 3C446 83 118 72 86.7% 2255-282 14 16 14 100.0% 0912+029 20 40 19 95.0% 1244-255 25 47 23 92.0% 1639+230 6 6 6 100.0% 2000+472 110 158 85 77.3% 2229+695 80 119 64 80.0% 0055-059 2 2 2 100.0% 0134+311 1 1 1 100.0% 0420+022 149 212 122 81.9% 0529+483 18 21 12 66.7% 0714+457 5 5 4 80.0% 1546+027 116 167 99 85.3% 1758+388 3 5 3 100.0% 2059+034 31 44 29 93.5% 2307+106 1 1 1 100.0% 0035-252 1 1 1 100.0% 0632-235 6 6 6 100.0% 0723+219 4 4 4 100.0% 0920-397 15 24 10 66.7% 1759-396 7 7 6 85.7% 2008-159 51 74 48 94.1% 0048-427 8 9 7 87.5% 0017+200 190 250 163 85.8% 0736+017 14 17 13 92.9% 0834-201 82 130 42 51.2% 1030+415 256 353 200 78.1% 1243-072 4 4 4 100.0% 1406-076 21 33 18 85.7% 1849+670 314 425 295 93.9% 2126-158 16 16 16 100.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 2955 4023 2493 84.4% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used FORTLEZA-MATERA 172 127 90 52.3% FORTLEZA-NYALES20 124 90 74 59.7% FORTLEZA-SEJONG 14 8 7 50.0% FORTLEZA-TSUKUB32 45 36 32 71.1% FORTLEZA-WETTZELL 162 117 98 60.5% FORTLEZA-YEBES40M 219 192 122 55.7% MATERA-NYALES20 151 149 139 92.1% MATERA-SEJONG 44 37 36 81.8% MATERA-TSUKUB32 92 88 88 95.7% MATERA-WETTZELL 196 188 188 95.9% MATERA-YEBES40M 196 185 185 94.4% NYALES20-SEJONG 101 87 84 83.2% NYALES20-TSUKUB32 183 175 162 88.5% NYALES20-WETTZELL 192 191 181 94.3% NYALES20-YEBES40M 163 161 149 91.4% SEJONG-TSUKUB32 412 399 396 96.1% SEJONG-WETTZELL 50 46 44 88.0% SEJONG-YEBES40M 29 19 19 65.5% TSUKUB32-WETTZELL 109 101 101 92.7% TSUKUB32-YEBES40M 80 79 78 97.5% WETTZELL-YEBES40M 221 221 220 99.5% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 2955 2696 2493 84.4% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.