IVS Analysis Report for AUST60 ($14NOV16XA) This report is the official IVS analysis report that corresponds to the database maintained by the IVS Data Centers for this session. (Analyzed by David Gordon, Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: None. Parameterization comments: None. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 3935 scheduled 3899 correlated (in database) 3634 recoverable (usable) 3540 used Session fit: 55.190 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M 1735 1508 1478 85.2% HOBART12 1960 1830 1783 91.0% KATH12M 1954 1840 1787 91.5% WARK12M 232 215 203 87.5% YARRA12M 1989 1875 1829 92.0% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 3935 3634 3540 90.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0727-115 80 74 71 88.8% 1144-379 79 79 75 94.9% 0826-373 73 73 64 87.7% 0454-810 264 264 197 74.6% OJ287 26 26 24 92.3% 2142-758 172 171 168 97.7% 0537-441 49 49 48 98.0% 1308+326 16 16 15 93.8% NRAO530 65 65 65 100.0% 1156+295 7 7 7 100.0% 1045-188 73 72 70 95.9% 0426-380 67 64 64 95.5% 1749+096 48 48 48 100.0% 1057-797 209 206 190 90.9% 1611+343 19 19 19 100.0% 4C39.25 15 15 14 93.3% 1610-771 7 7 7 100.0% 0834-201 62 62 34 54.8% 1758-651 121 120 115 95.0% 1032-199 49 49 48 98.0% 0748+126 27 27 24 88.9% 2326-477 62 61 58 93.5% 1424-418 136 135 126 92.6% 1038+064 6 6 5 83.3% 0637-752 119 119 104 87.4% 1548+056 38 37 36 94.7% 0648-165 55 54 51 92.7% 1921-293 32 31 31 96.9% 1741-038 88 83 80 90.9% 0308-611 98 98 85 86.7% 1510-089 72 72 65 90.3% 0516-621 83 82 81 97.6% 1633+38 12 12 12 100.0% 2355-534 77 77 77 100.0% 1519-273 16 16 11 68.8% 0230-790 110 110 87 79.1% 1128+385 13 11 11 84.6% 1334-127 88 88 84 95.5% 1751+288 19 19 17 89.5% 2029+121 37 37 30 81.1% 3C274 4 4 3 75.0% 1958-179 90 90 86 95.6% 2149-306 65 65 52 80.0% 2131-021 38 38 28 73.7% 2232-488 88 88 64 72.7% 2255-282 10 10 10 100.0% 2145+067 15 15 14 93.3% 3C446 48 48 37 77.1% 2136+141 21 20 17 81.0% 0454-463 49 49 46 93.9% 2201+315 13 12 11 84.6% 2355-106 6 6 6 100.0% 0106+013 44 44 43 97.7% 1933-400 57 57 57 100.0% 1954-388 12 12 12 100.0% 0202-172 31 31 31 100.0% 0229+131 4 4 4 100.0% 0119+115 29 29 22 75.9% 0332-403 78 78 72 92.3% 0319+121 21 21 20 95.2% 0202+319 9 9 8 88.9% 2227-088 36 36 35 97.2% 0420-014 41 41 38 92.7% CTA102 20 19 16 80.0% NRAO190 35 33 26 74.3% 0234+285 11 11 11 100.0% 0528+134 7 7 7 100.0% 0607-157 57 57 54 94.7% 0657+172 19 16 15 78.9% 0437-454 12 12 12 100.0% 0552+398 6 6 6 100.0% 0521-365 72 72 71 98.6% 0454-234 72 72 72 100.0% 0537-286 54 54 54 100.0% 0451-282 18 18 18 100.0% 0723-008 36 36 26 72.2% 0743-006 18 18 18 100.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 3935 3899 3540 90.0% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M-HOBART12 561 478 467 83.2% HART15M-KATH12M 541 462 450 83.2% HART15M-WARK12M 41 37 37 90.2% HART15M-YARRA12M 592 531 524 88.5% HOBART12-KATH12M 673 662 645 95.8% HOBART12-WARK12M 65 59 55 84.6% HOBART12-YARRA12M 661 631 616 93.2% KATH12M-WARK12M 65 61 57 87.7% KATH12M-YARRA12M 675 655 635 94.1% WARK12M-YARRA12M 61 58 54 88.5% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 3935 3634 3540 90.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.