Analysis Report for R1593 ($13JUL08XA) (Analyzed by David Gordon, GSFC Analysis Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: None. Parameterization comments: Hobart12 has a small break of ~.66 nsec at ~12:31 UTC. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 2235 scheduled 2140 correlated (in database) 2065 recoverable (usable) 1993 used Session fit: 22.003 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HARTRAO 468 436 417 89.1% HOBART12 610 603 588 96.4% KATH12M 606 602 588 97.0% NYALES20 634 570 548 86.4% TIGOCONC 281 236 228 81.1% WESTFORD 636 564 542 85.2% YARRA12M 591 579 569 96.3% YEBES40M 644 540 506 78.6% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 2235 2065 1993 89.2% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 1935-692 1 1 1 100.0% OK290 7 5 2 28.6% 1657-562 5 5 5 100.0% 0426+273 12 12 11 91.7% 0306+102 12 12 12 100.0% 1459+480 5 3 2 40.0% 0104-408 1 1 0 0.0% 0133+476 24 16 16 66.7% 0458-020 19 17 17 89.5% 0537-441 99 98 98 99.0% 0718+793 58 42 38 65.5% 0727-115 168 159 145 86.3% 0955+476 33 31 31 93.9% 1057-797 134 134 127 94.8% 1104-445 44 44 43 97.7% 1255-316 23 23 23 100.0% 1300+580 19 19 19 100.0% 1334-127 98 98 90 91.8% 1357+769 13 11 9 69.2% 1424-418 113 113 107 94.7% 1622-253 2 2 0 0.0% 1749+096 153 150 142 92.8% 3C371 77 70 67 87.0% 1921-293 68 66 64 94.1% 1923+210 23 23 21 91.3% 2052-474 71 71 70 98.6% 2255-282 46 46 43 93.5% 2318+049 33 33 33 100.0% 2356+385 4 4 4 100.0% 0345+460 3 3 1 33.3% 0800+618 50 43 40 80.0% 1149-084 3 3 2 66.7% 1324+224 187 183 175 93.6% 2000+472 33 33 28 84.8% 0054+161 27 27 27 100.0% 0055-059 3 3 3 100.0% 0536+145 13 9 9 69.2% 0641+392 1 1 1 100.0% 1144+402 50 44 43 86.0% 1546+027 121 120 85 70.2% 1617+229 26 26 24 92.3% 1732+389 13 13 13 100.0% 2059+034 15 15 15 100.0% 2141+175 27 27 26 96.3% 2214+350 38 38 38 100.0% 0606-223 6 4 2 33.3% 1656-075 2 2 1 50.0% 2008-159 48 46 42 87.5% 0016+731 59 49 43 72.9% 0308-611 27 27 25 92.6% 0332-403 115 113 108 93.9% 0925-203 3 2 2 66.7% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 2235 2140 1993 89.2% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HARTRAO-HOBART12 45 44 42 93.3% HARTRAO-KATH12M 39 39 38 97.4% HARTRAO-NYALES20 69 65 61 88.4% HARTRAO-TIGOCONC 77 74 72 93.5% HARTRAO-WESTFORD 62 59 57 91.9% HARTRAO-YARRA12M 58 56 56 96.6% HARTRAO-YEBES40M 118 99 91 77.1% HOBART12-KATH12M 262 261 254 96.9% HOBART12-NYALES20 16 15 15 93.8% HOBART12-TIGOCONC 32 29 28 87.5% HOBART12-WESTFORD 8 8 8 100.0% HOBART12-YARRA12M 242 241 236 97.5% HOBART12-YEBES40M 5 5 5 100.0% KATH12M-NYALES20 24 24 23 95.8% KATH12M-TIGOCONC 7 7 7 100.0% KATH12M-WESTFORD 5 5 5 100.0% KATH12M-YARRA12M 262 260 255 97.3% KATH12M-YEBES40M 7 6 6 85.7% NYALES20-TIGOCONC 21 16 16 76.2% NYALES20-WESTFORD 266 249 242 91.0% NYALES20-YARRA12M 18 17 17 94.4% NYALES20-YEBES40M 220 184 174 79.1% TIGOCONC-WESTFORD 75 56 55 73.3% TIGOCONC-YARRA12M 3 0 DESELECTED 0.0% TIGOCONC-YEBES40M 66 54 50 75.8% WESTFORD-YARRA12M 0 NO DATA NO DATA 0.0% WESTFORD-YEBES40M 220 187 175 79.5% YARRA12M-YEBES40M 8 5 5 62.5% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 2235 2065 1993 89.2% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.