Analysis Report for A1315 ($13DEC15XA) (Analyzed by David Gordon, GSFC Analysis Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: None. Parameterization comments: Some clock instability at Katherine and Yarragadee. Used 8/40 and 6/40 clock/atm constraints. Other comments: Some gaps at Warkworth due to encoder issues. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 2781 scheduled 2441 correlated (in database) 2134 recoverable (usable) 1955 used Session fit: 49.219 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M 965 736 698 72.3% HOBART12 1190 917 857 72.0% KATH12M 1174 945 832 70.9% WARK12M 1022 645 589 57.6% YARRA12M 1211 1025 934 77.1% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 2781 2134 1955 70.3% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0607-157 26 15 15 57.7% 0454-810 210 176 156 74.3% 1057-797 166 148 133 80.1% 0528+134 15 12 11 73.3% 0402-362 53 41 35 66.0% 0322+222 10 10 9 90.0% 1334-127 58 52 43 74.1% 0104-408 75 67 43 57.3% OJ287 19 18 14 73.7% 1156+295 24 21 18 75.0% 2300-683 109 91 67 61.5% 0648-165 32 26 21 65.6% 1149-084 34 32 23 67.6% 0727-115 44 36 29 65.9% 0308-611 78 69 58 74.4% 0748+126 16 13 13 81.2% 0627-199 23 19 19 82.6% 0537-286 27 23 20 74.1% 0230-790 164 149 140 85.4% 0556+238 13 12 12 92.3% 1519-273 69 64 56 81.2% 1759-396 80 75 41 51.2% 1144-379 66 60 54 81.8% 0454-234 33 30 30 90.9% 0346-279 27 26 15 55.6% 0524+034 1 1 0 0.0% 0358+210 1 1 1 100.0% 1351-018 29 27 11 37.9% 0332-403 42 37 33 78.6% 0808+019 26 25 12 46.2% 2052-474 84 72 63 75.0% 0847-120 39 39 29 74.4% 1622-253 54 50 7 13.0% 1606+106 27 27 5 18.5% 0420-014 27 20 17 63.0% 0743+277 2 2 2 100.0% 1354-152 37 36 30 81.1% 1324+224 23 23 20 87.0% 1514+197 15 14 10 66.7% 0657+172 13 10 7 53.8% 1040+244 10 9 5 50.0% 1124-186 38 37 30 78.9% 1034-293 58 58 29 50.0% 1921-293 42 42 33 78.6% 1741-038 57 51 44 77.2% 1908-201 48 42 38 79.2% 1749+096 31 30 24 77.4% 0827+243 3 3 1 33.3% 1958-179 52 48 45 86.5% 1219+044 23 23 18 78.3% 1936-155 33 32 31 93.9% 1255-177 19 18 16 84.2% 2255-282 55 43 34 61.8% 0834-201 1 1 1 100.0% 2029+121 29 26 21 72.4% 3C446 53 40 35 66.0% 2227-088 24 13 12 50.0% 2141+175 17 16 13 76.5% 2008-159 49 43 40 81.6% 2209+236 30 25 16 53.3% 0048-097 38 31 27 71.1% 0119+115 26 18 15 57.7% 2234+282 9 9 8 88.9% 1413+135 1 1 0 0.0% 0215+015 18 15 13 72.2% 1725+123 1 1 0 0.0% 0149+218 15 9 6 40.0% 0235+164 19 15 15 78.9% 0446+112 4 3 3 75.0% 2355-106 21 14 14 66.7% 0035-252 31 26 26 83.9% 2358+189 4 4 1 25.0% 0019+058 1 1 1 100.0% 0256-005 10 10 6 60.0% 0414-189 10 9 9 90.0% 0422+004 10 6 3 30.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 2781 2441 1955 70.3% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M-HOBART12 232 167 162 69.8% HART15M-KATH12M 241 197 182 75.5% HART15M-WARK12M 176 95 92 52.3% HART15M-YARRA12M 316 277 262 82.9% HOBART12-KATH12M 324 258 231 71.3% HOBART12-WARK12M 320 218 206 64.4% HOBART12-YARRA12M 314 274 258 82.2% KATH12M-WARK12M 277 174 148 53.4% KATH12M-YARRA12M 332 316 271 81.6% WARK12M-YARRA12M 249 158 143 57.4% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 2781 2134 1955 70.3% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.