Analysis Report for A1307 ($13DEC06XA) (Analyzed by David Gordon, GSFC Analysis Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: None. Parameterization comments: Clock breaks set at 10:54 and 16:51, according to correlator report. Offsets are very small, almost neglible. Other comments: None. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 3054 scheduled 2941 correlated (in database) 2581 recoverable (usable) 2536 used Session fit: 40.976 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M 1071 862 851 79.5% HOBART12 1301 1033 1018 78.2% KATH12M 1286 1118 1096 85.2% WARK12M 1125 977 957 85.1% YARRA12M 1325 1172 1150 86.8% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 3054 2581 2536 83.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 0607-157 46 36 34 73.9% 0454-810 230 210 200 87.0% 1057-797 186 176 170 91.4% 0528+134 15 14 13 86.7% 0402-362 73 69 65 89.0% 0322+222 13 13 12 92.3% 1334-127 59 53 52 88.1% 0104-408 81 81 61 75.3% OJ287 28 27 27 96.4% 1156+295 24 22 22 91.7% 2300-683 112 112 83 74.1% 0648-165 42 41 38 90.5% 1149-084 35 34 22 62.9% 0727-115 44 44 42 95.5% 0308-611 98 97 83 84.7% 0748+126 16 16 14 87.5% 0627-199 33 33 31 93.9% 0537-286 37 37 34 91.9% 0230-790 174 172 167 96.0% 0556+238 13 13 11 84.6% 1519-273 70 69 68 97.1% 1759-396 81 77 40 49.4% 1144-379 75 75 75 100.0% 0454-234 53 53 53 100.0% 0346-279 40 38 24 60.0% 0524+034 1 1 0 0.0% 0358+210 1 1 1 100.0% 1351-018 29 24 16 55.2% 0332-403 62 62 58 93.5% 0808+019 26 25 9 34.6% 2052-474 84 80 70 83.3% 0847-120 39 38 30 76.9% 1622-253 54 54 3 5.6% 1606+106 27 27 6 22.2% 0420-014 43 43 40 93.0% 0743+277 2 2 2 100.0% 1354-152 37 37 34 91.9% 1324+224 23 22 21 91.3% 1514+197 15 15 14 93.3% 0657+172 13 13 13 100.0% 1040+244 11 10 9 81.8% 1124-186 38 36 30 78.9% 1034-293 58 54 25 43.1% 1921-293 42 39 29 69.0% 1741-038 57 55 55 96.5% 1908-201 48 48 42 87.5% 1749+096 31 31 28 90.3% 0827+243 3 3 3 100.0% 1958-179 52 49 48 92.3% 1219+044 26 24 23 88.5% 1936-155 33 32 31 93.9% 1255-177 19 12 10 52.6% 2255-282 55 55 52 94.5% 0834-201 1 1 1 100.0% 2029+121 29 28 26 89.7% 3C446 53 53 47 88.7% 2227-088 24 21 21 87.5% 2141+175 17 17 16 94.1% 2008-159 49 49 49 100.0% 2209+236 30 29 29 96.7% 0048-097 39 39 35 89.7% 0119+115 26 24 18 69.2% 2234+282 9 9 7 77.8% 1413+135 1 1 1 100.0% 0215+015 19 19 14 73.7% 1725+123 1 1 0 0.0% 0149+218 15 15 12 80.0% 0235+164 22 20 20 90.9% 0446+112 14 14 10 71.4% 2355-106 21 21 19 90.5% 0035-252 32 32 32 100.0% 2358+189 4 4 4 100.0% 0019+058 1 1 1 100.0% 0256-005 10 10 6 60.0% 0414-189 20 19 19 95.0% 0422+004 10 10 6 60.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 3054 2941 2536 83.0% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HART15M-HOBART12 259 183 182 70.3% HART15M-KATH12M 267 222 217 81.3% HART15M-WARK12M 199 155 154 77.4% HART15M-YARRA12M 346 302 298 86.1% HOBART12-KATH12M 352 284 279 79.3% HOBART12-WARK12M 347 294 288 83.0% HOBART12-YARRA12M 343 272 269 78.4% KATH12M-WARK12M 305 271 266 87.2% KATH12M-YARRA12M 362 341 334 92.3% WARK12M-YARRA12M 274 257 249 90.9% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 3054 2581 2536 83.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.